Click here to sign up for our newsletter & receive a £5 voucher![close]
×

Registration

Profile Informations

Login Details

or login

First name is required!
Last name is required!
First name is not valid!
Last name is not valid!
This is not an email address!
Email address is required!
This email is already registered!
Password is required!
Enter a valid password!
Please enter 6 or more characters!
Please enter 16 or less characters!
Passwords are not same!
Terms and Conditions are required!
Email or Password is wrong!

Another Day, Another Intel Coffee Lake Leak Complete With Full Benchmarks

coffee lake banner

There's been a ton of talk surrounding Intel's upcoming 8th-gen Core processors, dubbed "Coffee Lake". Based on what we've seen so far, Intel is striking back hard at AMD, offering more cores at the top-end (over its own previous generation), and higher frequencies overall. We've even seen the Core i7-8700K overclock to 4.8GHz on air, which is almost a surprise given Intel's typical use of less-than-ideal thermal interface material on its chips.

While the embargo for Intel's 8th-gen chips isn't quite up yet, one Romanian website decided to publish early, and let the world gawk over its results. Both the Core i7-8700K and i5-8600K were included, as well as their direct AMD competition, the Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 1600X.

Cinebench Coffee Lake

Cinebench Coffee Lake

In Blender, the Core i7-8700K placed ahead of the Ryzen 5 1700, rendering a project in 144 seconds, versus 183, and helping to prove that different price-points can nod in different directions, the Core i5-8600K (218s) fell below its nearest competition, the Ryzen 5 1600X (199s). The same sort of results can be seen in Cinebench, whereas in POV-Ray, Intel took a definitive lead. In a HandBrake test, Intel lead the pack, but by a rather insignificant margin.

Perhaps not-so-surprisingly, Intel also has the lead in the gaming tests, although the biggest spread is at 1080p. We'd have to imagine that very few people would notice the difference of 10 FPS when a game is already delivering 100+ FPS, although we'd concede if your goals were strictly 144Hz-targeted.

If you want to see more independent test results of these chips, coupled with our usual informative look, stay glued to this very site next week!

Go to Source