of affordable mid-range 5G-capable smartphones, with devices like
the OnePlus Nord, Moto One 5G, Pixel 4a 5G, TCL 10 5G UW,
and Realme 7 5G, all costing less than $500 and packing decent
specs -- including reasonably quick SoCs, multiple rear cameras, and even high refresh-rate displays. Thankfully, 2021 is looking even more
promising, and January isn’t even over yet.
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G ($299, Snapdragon 690) recently landed
in the US, and Moto just launched the Moto One 5G Ace ($399,
Snapdragon 750G), a detuned and unlocked variant of last year’s
AT&T and Verizon-exclusive Moto One 5G ($445, Snapdragon 765). So, how do the Moto One 5G Ace and Moto One 5G differ? Is the
Ace as good as its model naming suggests, despite being even cheaper? Read on for our review.
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace Hardware And Design
resemblance is obvious. In the back, you’ll find a similarly
rounded square camera pod and similarly dimpled texture under its faux glass surface. Our review unit came in a Frosted Silver hue
which produces lovely rainbow reflections in direct sunlight. If
that’s too much excitement for you, a more subdued Volcanic Gray
color is also available.
The Moto logo in the back of the Ace isn’t just a stencil. It’s
home to a capacitive fingerprint reader, unlike the One 5G,
where the power / lock key doubles as the fingerprint reader. In
front, both have 6.7-inch displays, but different aspect ratios
and punch hole layouts. At 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9mm, the Ace (20:9) is
a couple mm wider and shorter than the One 5G (21:9). It’s also
one mm thicker and slightly heavier (212g vs. 207g).
a single opening in the top middle of the screen. This also means
it only features one selfie camera, which is the same 16MP main
front shooter as on the Moto One 5G. Likewise, bezels are reasonably
small, but there’s a more pronounced chin at the bottom of the
display. The Ace also shares the One 5G’s plastic build with a
faux-metal mid-frame and faux-glass back.
Despite the overall shape of the camera bumps being similar, with
four circles in a square layout, there are only three shooters in
the rear of the Ace (vs. four on the One 5G) -- a 48MP main
camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro. The fourth circle is
home to the LED flash instead of a dedicated depth sensor. Also
missing from the Moto One 5G Ace is the One 5G’s unique light ring around the
Ace as on the One 5G. You’ll find the volume rocker and ridged
power/lock key on the right side, and the mono speaker, primary
mic, USB Type-C port, and headphone jack along the bottom edge.
The left side is home to the nano-SIM / microSD tray, and there’s
a secondary mic on top. In all, the Ace looks and feels nice
enough, but doesn’t really stand out.
Here's an unboxing video to get you acquainted with Moto's latest value Android handset...
And 5G Platform
|Display||6.7" FHD+ LTPS, 2400x1080
resolution, HDR 10
|Storage||128GB + microSD
f/1.8 Main PDAF - 8MP f/2.2 118º Ultra-Wide - 2MP f/2.4
|Front-Facing Cameras||16MP f/2.0
4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps, 1080p slow-mo
|Dimensions||166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9mm|
|Connectivity||802.11ac Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.1+LE,
NFC, FM radio, USB-C, LTE, 5G Sub-6 Only
Silver, Volcanic Gray
|Pricing||Find the Moto One 5G Ace @ Amazon, Starting at $399|
Moto One 5G Ace Display Quality
and includes HDR10 support. But instead of sharing the One 5G’s
21:9 aspect ratio and 90Hz refresh rate, the Ace features a more
traditional 20:9 aspect ratio (2400 x 1080 pixels, 393ppi) and
standard 60Hz refresh rate. Still, it’s a nice display, with
punchy colors, good contrast, and decent viewing angles. It’s also
bright enough for complete usability in direct sunlight.
Moto One 5G Ace Camera Performance And Image Quality
Basically, the Ace inherits most of the One 5G’s cameras,
including the 48MP f/1.8 0.8-micron main shooter (with PDAF), 8MP
f/2.2 118-degree 1.12-micron ultrawide, and 16MP f/2.0 1.0-micron
selfie camera. It drops the 8MP ultrawide in front, and the 2MP
depth sensor in the back, however. The 5MP macro gives way to a 2MP f/2.4
1.75-micron macro lens (with AF). And overall, imaging performance
is similarly compromised.
The Ace uses 4-to-1 pixel binning on the main camera and selfies shooters, to reduce noise and improve low-light performance -- just like the
One 5G. By default, pictures shot with the main sensor are 12MP,
and images taken with the selfie lens are 4MP. While there’s a
16MP option for selfies, there’s no full-resolution 48MP mode for
the main camera. In addition, night mode is only available on the
main and selfie shooters. There’s no OIS (Optical Image Stabilization).
When it comes to capturing video, the Ace supports 4k 30fps and
1080p 60fps with the main camera, and 1080p 30fps with the
ultrawide, macro, and selfie shooters. Audio is recorded in
stereo, and video is stabilized. The usual Moto shooting modes are
available, including portrait, night, panorama, pro, macro,
cutout, spot color, cinemagraph, group selfie, filters, slow
motion (1080p 120fps or 720p 240fps), and time lapse.
sometimes manages to snap good photos, but most images lack detail
and saturation. Noise is a problem in low light and pictures taken
in night mode are oddly soft. Zooming is fine up to 2-3x, but
anything beyond that results in grainy and blurry imaging. Macro shots are
limited by the 2MP sensor, but the AF lens helps.
Selfies are pretty nice, though, so there’s that. And videos are
decent, too. Ultimately, this camera system is typical Moto: it
combines lackluster sensors (likely Samsung’s GM1 for the main
shooter) with mediocre image processing. The Ace takes acceptable
photos if you stick to the main lens (below 3x zoom) and the
ultrawide, and give it enough light. Just don’t expect it to match
the higher-end competition.
Next up: Moto One 5G Ace audio, performance, and battery life...