Click here to sign up for our newsletter & receive a £5 voucher![close]
×

Registration

Profile Informations

Login Details

or login

First name is required!
Last name is required!
First name is not valid!
Last name is not valid!
This is not an email address!
Email address is required!
This email is already registered!
Password is required!
Enter a valid password!
Please enter 6 or more characters!
Please enter 16 or less characters!
Passwords are not same!
Terms and Conditions are required!
Email or Password is wrong!

Samsung, Hynix And Micron Slapped With Class Action Suit Over DRAM Supply Collusion And Price Gouging

Price fixing in the DRAM space is nothing new; as recently as January, a Chinese regulator accused Samsung other chip manufacturers of artificially increasing prices to pad their margins. Samsung is no stranger to price fixing, as a $300 million judgement against it and Hynix was handed down in 2006 here in the United States.

Today, however, Samsung and other DRAM manufacturers are facing another legal fight in the U.S., and it comes courtesy of the law firm Hagens Berman. The lawsuit was filed today in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and alleges that Samsung along with Micron and Hynix conspired to artificially limit the supply of DRAM chips in an effort to keep prices high. As a result, device manufacturers that rely on DRAM chips had to pay inflated prices, and those costs were of course passed on to you, the consumer. This has especially been true as higher DRAM costs have resulted in inflated prices for graphics cards that we PC gamers all love.

According to Hagens Berman, the above trio of companies together command 96 percent of the DRAM market. The companies' actions resulted in the price of 4GB of DRAM jumping 130 percent during the class period (July 1, 2016 through February 1, 2018). Interestingly enough, the trio also experienced more than a doubling in revenue between Q1 2016 and Q3 2017. How convenient…

The lawsuit outlines the behavior, stating:

Defendants each made public statements affirming their commitment to the common plan to curtail supply, and to not compete for each other’s market share by supply expansion. For example, Defendants informed the other Defendants through public statements, that they would keep total wafer capacity flat in order to constrain DRAM supply growth, they would only grow DRAM supply between 15-20% in 2017, even as DRAM demand grew 20-25%, and that they would refrain from taking each other’s market share. 

It is also alleged that even though prices for DRAM more than doubled during the class period, the costs for Samsung, Micron and Hynix associated with producing the memory chips did not increase. Likewise, there were no major changes in process technology to justify the drastic increase in prices.

If the Hagens Berman name sounds familiar, it’s because it was the firm responsible for securing the aforementioned $300 million settlement against Samsung and Hynix. So, it has the experience in this type of litigation and the investigative know-how to see this case through to its eventual resolution.

“What we’ve uncovered in the DRAM market is a classic antitrust, price-fixing scheme in which a small number of kingpin corporations hold the lion’s share of the market,” said Steve Berman, who serves as managing partner at Hagens Berman. “Instead of playing by the rules, Samsung, Micron and Hynix chose to put consumers in a chokehold, wringing the market for more profit.”

What makes this case so interesting is the breadth of devices it covers. Since DRAM is used in just about all of our computing devices, if you purchased a new smartphone, tablet, or computer in the past two years, you're probably able to join in on the lawsuit, which is seeking class action status. To inquire more about the class-action, and how to sign-up, you can visit the following link.

').insertAfter(jQuery('#initdisqus'));
}
loadDisqus(jQuery('#initdisqus'), disqus_identifier, url);

}
else {
setTimeout(function () { disqusDefer(); }, 50);
}
}

disqusDefer();

function loadDisqus(source, identifier, url) {

if (jQuery("#disqus_thread").length) {
jQuery("#disqus_thread").remove();
}
jQuery('

').insertAfter(source);

if (window.DISQUS) {

DISQUS.reset({
reload: true,
config: function () {
this.page.identifier = identifier;
this.page.url = url;
}
});

} else {

//insert a wrapper in HTML after the relevant "show comments" link

disqus_identifier = identifier; //set the identifier argument
disqus_url = url; //set the permalink argument

//append the Disqus embed script to HTML
var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;
dsq.src = 'https://' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js';
jQuery('head').append(dsq);

}

jQuery('.show-disqus').show();
source.hide();
};

function disqusEvent()
{
idleTime = 0;
}

Go to Source